Insights: Publications 5 Key Takeaways | 2025 SALT Summer Update
Kilpatrick’s David Hughes and Jordan Goodman recently presented a “2025 SALT Summer Update” in association with AGN International - a worldwide association of separate and independent accounting and advisory businesses who provide assurance, accounting, tax and advisory services across the globe. They highlighted the critical role that accountants play in SALT planning and transaction structuring. The attendees gained insight into common income tax and sales tax pitfalls when SALT considerations are overlooked in transactions and heard strategies to minimize SALT exposure in M&A deals.
David and Jordan’s key takeaways from their presentation include:
1. The Importance of Early Tax Department Involvement in M&A Planning
Tax issues are often not the primary focus during mergers and acquisitions (M&A) planning, but they can become significant if not addressed early. The tax department should be involved from the outset and should proactively stay informed about ongoing deals. This early engagement helps to identify and quantify potential tax issues before time pressures mount and ensures that tax considerations are not overlooked in the transaction.
2. Seller Considerations: Income, Sales/Use and Other Taxes
When selling a business, sellers need to be mindful of several income tax issues, including state tax basis, allocation versus apportionment of income, sourcing of gain, and the treatment of goodwill. Different transaction structures (stock deals vs. asset deals) can lead to varying tax obligations, including sales and use tax, real estate transfer taxes, and special taxes on titled property.
3. Buyer Considerations: Successor Liability and Due Diligence
For buyers, the importance of understanding and mitigating successor liability is critical, which can arise whether purchasing stock or assets. To mitigate this risk, buyers should conduct a nexus study, consider indemnification and escrow arrangements, and utilize voluntary disclosure agreements.
4. Mutual Considerations: Contract Terms and Definitions
It is important to consider contract provisions that affect both buyers and sellers, focusing on the need for clear definitions within the purchase agreement—such as what constitutes a "tax" and whether local taxes or unclaimed property are included. The agreement should also address which party will receive state tax refunds, who is responsible for transaction taxes, and the seller's obligations regarding post-sale audit defense, maintaining records, and forwarding tax notices.
5. Due Diligence: Identifying Exposure and Integration Issues
The due diligence process required in M&A transactions must be comprehensive. This includes investigating where the seller has filed or not filed taxes, understanding the nature of the seller's business and how it affects apportionment, and identifying states with material exposure. Due diligence also includes analyzing historical filings, audit history, and tax elections made by the seller to minimize current and future tax liabilities and to ensure a smooth post-acquisition integration.
For more information, please contact:
David Hughes, dhughes@ktslaw.com
and Jordan Goodman, jgoodman@ktslaw.com.
Related People
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
